[Tfn-suggestions] Fw: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Silly-billy 6/7/96

[Robert Naughton]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <vivfi@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Silly-billy 6/7/96


> From: Mike_Corley_Fan_Club@Nut_house.org (Old_500)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.media,alt.radio.uk,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc
> Subject: MC Exposed as a Fraud
> Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1996 17:01:05 GMT
> Organization: Anti-Nuts Inc.
> Lines: 33
> Message-ID: <31de9b91.11926469@news.dircon.co.uk>
> References: <Du4LqI.32o.0.bloor@torfree.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: gw5-055.pool.dircon.co.uk
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/16.227
>
>
> Sad, confused and emotional disturbed Mike Corley wrote:
>
>             { snip }
>
> Because he has made himself into a martyr and now he finds it
impossible to
> back down.  Mike's big secret has now been exposed.  He made
everything up.
>
> Every time Mike makes allegations against the police, MI5,
> Tom-Dick-and-Harry etc. those organisations have taken people off
vitally
> important work to ascertain whether or not there was any substance in
Mike's
> ranting allegations.
>
> When I'm told by someone who really does know such things that there
was
> never any plot to get Mike then I trust that person sufficiently
enough to
> accept his word.
>
> The problem is Mike has escalated matters to an extreme level and like
many
> silly billys he will find it impossible to give up all his self
created crap
> and to live a normal life.  After all what can Mike do now this crap
has
> been exposed as untrue ?  What new cause can Mike dedicate himself to
?
> (Some might read that as: who else can Mike now start upsetting ?)
>
> So Mike write to John Major, c/o the Private Secretary, 10 Downing
Street,
> London SW1A 2AA and ask the Prime Minister to help you.  I'd normally
> disclose his fax numbers but if I did that you might jam up the lines
with
> abusive postings just like you do here on Usenet.
>
> Is anyone interested in joining with me to do a mass e-mailing of
protests
> to Anon Penet and to Toronto Free Net in an attempt to flood their
computer
> systems thus forcing them to seriously consider pulling the plug on
Mike ?
> I'm not sure but is my proposal called a "flame" ?
>
> ======================================================================
>
> From: BigEars@technocom.com (Big Ears.)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.media,alt.radio.uk,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc
> Subject: Re: MC Exposed as a Fraud
> Date: Sat Jul  6 17:34:46 1996
>
> John Youles commented:
>
> > I've found that torfree.net don't respond, perhaps if they got a
high
> > enough number of complaints they might take notice.  See their web
pages
> > for email addresses.
>
> Perhaps we should give Mike 7 days from today (6 July 96) to come to
his
> senses and they start a massive multiple E-mailing campaign to Toronto
Free
> Net.  If all us victims send multiple copies of E-mails to the right
> addresses in Toronto then perhaps the Canadians will begin to get the
> appropriate message.
>
> Copy e-mailed to Mike, just so he knows what is coming if he persists.
>
>
>
>  Big Ears.                            Posted to uk.misc
> ==================================================================
>  Please think of the people sleeping in shop doorways every night
> ==================================================================
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: I'm wasting MI5's time! I should be arrested!
> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.legal,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc,alt.journalism,alt.journalism.print
,$
> Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> Summary:
> Keywords:
>
>
> It's such a pity that the Security Service has no powers of arrest.
How are
> they supposed to implement a proper secret police state without the
ability to
> snatch Joe Citizen off the street whenever they feel like it?
>
> "Old_500" aka "Big Ears" aka "PC Plod" wrote:
> >Every time Mike makes allegations against the police, MI5,
> >Tom-Dick-and-Harry etc. those organisations have taken people off
vitally
> >important work to ascertain whether or not there was any substance in
Mike's
> >ranting allegations.
>
> I see. So they're not wasting six years of manpower to persecute you.
They're
> wasting six years of manpower to prove I'm _not_ being persecuted.
>
> I wish I was clever enough to think of something like that. I really,
really do.
>
> >When I'm told by someone who really does know such things that there
was
> >never any plot to get Mike then I trust that person sufficiently
enough to
> >accept his word.
>
> Come on "Big Ears", why don't you admit that you made this posting?
This is
> exactly the same line you were feeding me a few months ago. The posts
are from
> the same news server, it's even the same newsreading software (Forte
Agent
> .99e/16.227).
>
> I'm afraid that if you friend "in the know" denied the existence of a
plot then
> he was being, as they say, economical with the truth. Judging by the
extreme
> reaction in London in May, and the panic you're showing now, as well
as the
> replay post yesterday, I would say that things are hotting up again.
But for
> you this time, not for me. I am out of harm's way, and there is very
little you
> can do as long as I stay out of the UK.
>