[Tfn-suggestions] Fw: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95

[Robert Naughton]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <eveififmi@freeserve.com>
Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95


> From: michaelm@easynet.co.uk (michaelm@easynet.co.uk)
> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk
> Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost)
> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT
> Organization: ------------
> Lines: 89
> Message-ID: <817374781.20251@michaelm.easynet.co.uk>
> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
>
> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote:
>
> | In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in
London by
> | what are believed to be elements of the security services. The
harassment has
> | continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print
media,
> | and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in
public
> | places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they
are aware
> | what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it.
>
> <whopping great snip of 884 lines>
>
> corley, you puzzle me!
>
> i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the
following:
>
> 1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda
of
> furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's
> cause,  "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very
very
> sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet
(censorship)
> bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt
it!
>
> 2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet
> pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet
more and
> more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the
entire
> editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic,
blood-leeching ,
> totalitarian twats -  can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its
way
> ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered
by
> uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet
maniacs -
> net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for
> 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn
> responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th
rape "
> net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for
> 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net
porn
> responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd
rape "
> net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible
for
> 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn
> responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th
rape "
> net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the
old
> nag's mouth..
>
> lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two
common
> ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite
> evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights
> case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar
words
> "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C.
>
> >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s)
and you
> >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape
the
> >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even
> >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.)
>
> 4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational"
> programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to
justify
> enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for
the
> echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising"
>
> 5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or
> insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of
> repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like
complete
> and utter bullshit.
>
> 6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student
> psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered
> dihydrocodeine.
>
> 7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public
awareness of
> the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave
> surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of
black
> crims, say no more.
>
> 8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who,
it is
> believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching
framework of
> self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of
> RFC1036')
>
>
> my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed
canucks
> instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing
> experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or
perhaps
> "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing
trick
> - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly
edible
> four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse
could
> fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the
.net
> now ?????  A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching..
> >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!!
>
> ======================================================
>
> From: Gulliver <kst2co@herts.ac.uk>
> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk
> Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost)
> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000
> Organization: University of Hertfordshire
> Lines: 12
> Message-ID:
<Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000@altair.herts.ac.uk>
> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net>
<817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> In-Reply-To: <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>
>
>
> Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I
> heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an
immigrant
> from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he
> emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he
> had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were
> putting something into the locks!).
>
> Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell,
> loonies make life more fun!
> --
> Angus Gulliver
>
> =======================================================
>
> Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now
> Newsgroups: uk.misc
> Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>
> >Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell,
> >loonies make life more fun!
>
> Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual
> target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto
unknown
> nonentities such as myself.
>
> >corley, you puzzle me!
>
> Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness?
>
> >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s)
and you
> >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape
the
> >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even
> >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.)
>
> Bloody well go for it I will.
>
> I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually.
> There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be
motivated
> to get their act together and pursue the case.
>
> >my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed
canucks
> >instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing
>
> the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to
hear
> about that
>
> >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!!
>