[Tfn-suggestions] Fw: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Old_500 5/7/96

Robert Naughton aovf16@dsl.pipex.com
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:37:48 -0000


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <evmvmeif@freeserve.com>
Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Old_500 5/7/96


> From: box6565@embankment.com (Old_500)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc
> Subject: Dear Mike Corley
> Followup-To: uk.legal,uk.misc
> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 1996 15:41:16 GMT
> Organization: XYz
> Lines: 55
> Message-ID: <31dd3788.8481134@news.dircon.co.uk>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: gw1-073.pool.dircon.co.uk
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/16.227
>
>
> ==================================================
>
> Subject: Now we tell the truth as it really is
> Newsgroups: uk.misc
> Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> Summary:
> Keywords:
>
>
> :AND a second posting which appeared in uk.legal on 5th July 1996
(isn't Mr
> :Corley popular ?)
>
> >       Dear Mike,
>
> >       I've just spoken to a man who knows and he has told me you
> >       have never ever been a target.
>
> >       My man knows because he once wrote a report on you after
> >       you made complaints.
>
> Come off it "Big Ears", if you're going to pretend someone else is
giving me
> advice then at least get one of your fellow coppers to write it so
that it
> isn't obviously written in the same style as your posts.
>
> Also both your post and the one you're pretending isn't yours were
posted from
> pipex via news.dircon.co.uk, viz:
>
> YOURS;
>
> From: BigEars@technocom.com (Big Ears.)
> Message-ID: <31ddacfe.7445797@news.dircon.co.uk>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: gw5-072.pool.dircon.co.uk
>
> "NOT YOURS";
>
> From: box6565@embankment.com (Old_500)
> Message-ID: <31dd3788.8481134@news.dircon.co.uk>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: gw1-073.pool.dircon.co.uk
>
>
> :NCIS leaks and most policemen regard it as unaccountable and
occasionally
> :insecure.  M Howard promises to make NCIS publicly accountable.
>
> You know a lot about what policemen think, don't you?
>