[Tfn-suggestions] Fw: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Do they fear truth? 3/10/95

[Robert Naughton]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <efievim@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Do they fear truth? 3/10/95


> From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Krüger)
> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,alt.politics.british
> Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services
> Date: 3 Oct 1995 15:38:20 GMT
> Organization: Steinkrug Publications
> Lines: 66
> Message-ID: <44rldc$nrm@news.cityscape.co.uk>
> References: <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: aa040.du.pipex.com
> X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+
>
> In article <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike
Corley) says:
> >
> >It completely mystifies me how it can be done. One night in June 1992
I
> >was in a bed-and-breakfast in Oxford (some hard facts now, you'll be
> >bored of the generalisations). I booked the B&B from the office
phone.
> >So if they had the office bugged, or the phone system bugged, they
could
> >have heard the call.
>
> If it was as late as 1992 then there was already a system available to
> feed digital video out of a domestic TV via the mains. Each raster of
> video was preceded by a sixteen bit address which identified the
> television set. All that was needed was a decoder box plugged into the
> mains somewhere between your room and the grid transformer. The signal
> was decoded and then fed down to the phone line. They probably
> even had a PC which enabled them to see the picture as well. By 1992
the
> technology had moved on from slowscan to near real time video with the
> advent of devices from Brooktree and  Harris etc.
>
>
> >the newsreader reacted. Breathed deeply, as if in psychological
relief.
>
> Maybe, or perhaps as if in:-
>
> sci.psychology.announce
> sci.psychology.consciousness
> sci.psychology.journals.psyche
> sci.psychology.journals.psycoloquy
> sci.psychology.misc
> sci.psychology.personality
> sci.psychology.psychotherapy
> sci.psychology.research
> sci.psychology.theory
>
> >I can't describe to you what goes through your mind when you know
> >someone on TV is "seeing" you the viewer.
>
> You're doing OK so far.
>
> >Your instinct is to switch the TV off, to change channel,
>
> Not much point unless you switch off the TV at the mains
>
> >like an ostrich,
>
> Looks like Ostrich farming is going to catch on in the UK as you may
have seen in
> some of the other uk newsgroups
>
>
> >The one time I did directly ask someone in the company who knew what
was
> >going on, first he spewed wool about, "well we have to think what is
> >reality and what is proof anyway", then went into barefaced denial
liar
> >mode. It opens your eyes, if they can't say out loud what they keep
> >saying in a disguised fashion, they must fear exposure, they must
fear
> >the truth.
>
> wool_ barefaced_ denial_ liar_ eyes_ fashion_ fear_ exposure,
>
> How is your mother these days Mike?
>
> And BTW - How is the thesis coming along?
>
> Peter Kruger
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.gold.net/flames/
> flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk
>