[Tfn-suggestions] Fw: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Shoot to Kill 4/4/96

[Robert Naughton]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <imvimfe@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: MI-5,Persecution (use2) - Shoot to Kill 4/4/96


> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british
> From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker)
> Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start?
> Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com
> Date: Thu Apr  4 05:03:01 1996
>
> jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote:
>
> >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote:
>
> >>Why would
> >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and
more than fiv
>
> >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ...
>
> >So why didn't they just shoot you dead?
> >It would have been a lot cheaper.
>
> Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike.
> It was a serious question.
>
>
>         Jill              (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one
else's)
>
> =================================================================
>
> Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start?
> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british
> Followup-To:
uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british
> References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net>
> Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> Distribution:
>
>
> jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote:
>
> >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote:
>
> >>Why would
> >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and
more
> than fiv
> >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ...
>
> >So why didn't they just shoot you dead?
> >It would have been a lot cheaper.
>
> I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as
opposed
> to verbal;
>
> a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but
> lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and
> lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people
would
> condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good
day
> as one of their own.
>
> b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying,
verbal
> harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the
> physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police
become
> involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say
'not
> our problem'.
>
> So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting
one
> of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as
the
> police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they
> can pretend they weren't responsible).
>
> It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you
> don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just
> cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior
> motive?
>